Like many of the students who attended classes Monday, I muddled over why we had school on Labor Day. Finding your dissent to the staff editorial, I hoped to unearth a credible explanation. Not only is the argument for school on Labor Day wholly weak, the message is offensive to the reader. The dissent case begins by describing what Labor Day is, how the day is a celebration of the "values and dreams of the working class" with emphasis on "(living) a better life." The argument finally surfaces in the rhetorical assertion of "what better way is there to honor the sacrifices of those who have gone before us than to attend those classes they toiled, sweated, and bled for."
If I'm not mistaken, do we not spend the entire semester honoring their toil, sweat and blood by attending classes? Are we not realizing "their dreams of self-improvement" by attending college at all? It is our choice to be here, and in doing so, we honor those sacrifices made by the countless laborers of our nation. Labor Day is, lest we forget, a national holiday. It is one of the few in the hundreds of faceless, mundane days of year where the routine of working through life is interrupted by a 24-hour celebration. The laborers of our nation gave us Labor Day, they gave us the assurance that we can celebrate for one day and not worry, they gave us the "better life" in which we can enjoy a holiday to remember them.