Rule considers cash, not age
The mandatory retirement policy IU now has is not about age discrimination. It would be ridiculous to hire someone at age 63, have them work for two years, and then suddenly find them unfit to do their job simply because they turned 65. Of course, the ridiculous does sometimes happen, as in the case of former athletics director Clarence Doninger last year, who was forced to retire after holding the position for just over two years. Still, there is no magic line someone crosses on his 65th birthday that makes him suddenly incompetent; if Doninger was fit for the position at 63, being 65 couldn't have made much of a difference. But mandatory retirement isn't about age; it's about money. Yesterday, representatives from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission met at 9:30 a.m. in Bryan Hall to sign an agreement requiring the University to rewrite its stance on mandatory retirement. It's easy to support this as an ideal, but when the time comes to pay tuition, those in favor of rewriting the mandatory retirement policy might come to regret it.

