Columnist should
concentrate on Planned Parenthood's good qualities
In Abram Hess's Jan. 18 column "An easy choice", he describes a discussion with an animal-rights activist and gets her to admit that she would never want to be in the difficult position of whether or not to kill a violent dog, and that is why he is anti-choice. Hess never mentions there is a way to avoid the position of having to choose an abortion -- make contraception more accessible and provide comprehensive sex education in school. Fewer unplanned pregnancies will lead to fewer abortions, which is something that both the pro-life and pro-choice sides can stand behind. Instead of berating Planned Parenthood for "raking in money by the boatload to kill human beings" (a statement incredibly fraught with debate), why not support it for the other important services it provides, including contraception distribution and gynecological care, that prevent an estimated 617,000 unintended pregnancies annually, according to the Planned Parenthood Web site? This will lead to fewer women having to face a difficult choice -- a choice that Hess, as a male, will never have to make.