Thursday, Jan. 10,2008 11:26 a.m.
I must say that while I tend to fundamentally disagree with almost everything Chase Cooper writes, I do respect the IDS for injecting a conservative opinion into what I do feel is a left-leaning newspaper. However, I take objection to several facets of Mr. Cooper’s article outlining his personal definitions of modern, youthful conservatism. While I am willing to tolerate an editorial opinion similar to Mr. Cooper’s personal definition of what modern conservatives and liberals stand for, the article’s location on the front page as providing a definition to conservatism is absolutely absurd without providing an alternative view of what conservatism means to others. One trait of liberalism Mr. Cooper conveniently forgot is our steadfast support for something called freedom of expression. Check with those founding fathers you’re so adroitly referencing; I believe they founded this country on that belief also.
While Mr. Cooper trumpets his view that liberals insist upon big government in political agenda, and that this is a crucial facet of liberalism, I ask him to merely regard the current administration. I ask him to look back to the Reagan years, which he and every other conservative currently is so fond of quoting with a misguided sense of utopia, and question whether Mr. Reagan would view favorably the Bush Administration’s irresponsible spending policies. Furthermore, I ask that if one does not consider the Bush administration a big government-type system, then isn’t it possible that by micromanaging the governments of Afghanistan and Iraq, as we’ve done for years, we’ve expanded our government’s role in our society? Secondly, I ask Mr. Cooper to prove how the actions of Sen. David Vitter, R-La.; Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho; former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas; Rep. John Doolittle, R-Calif.; and Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio; support the “morality/values” platform that Mr. Cooper adamantly trumpets as the foundation of conservatism. I guess you could ask Jack Abramoff.
Apologies, Mr. Cooper, for I enjoy reading your ill-informed, warped perspective on American policy. What is lacking in this country presently are forums for open debate by members of both ideologies. However, your absurd notion of what conservatism is forced me to write.