Editor's note: All opinions, columns and letters reflect the views of the individual writer and not necessarily those of the IDS or its staffers.
Walk into any new cafe, nursery or condo lobby and you'll see the same palette: white walls, wood tones and nothing loud.
Ornament and color didn’t disappear because they were harmful. Restraint became a profitable look, one that photographs well and signals status. A blank white room costs a designer or a brand less to produce and photograph than one filled with pattern, texture and detail, and it reads as premium regardless. Stripping a space down became a way to sell simplicity as sophistication, at a lower production cost.
Meanwhile, the anti-consumerist values the original minimalism movement was built on got left behind. Henry David Thoreau, a father of the movement, didn't retreat to Walden Pond so someone could sell a $340 "capsule wardrobe" starter kit a century and a half later.
The idea he and other 19th-century transcendentalists championed was about intention: own less so what remained matters.
Somewhere between that idea and the all-white apartments flooding social media feeds today, something got lost.
Look at what has happened to the front door. Carved wood framing, a visible brass handle, a porch worth sitting on used to say something about the people living behind it.
Now, new builds favor push doors with invisible handles, no peepholes and cement slabs where porches used to be. There’s no proof that a flat door opens and closes better than a carved one. Builders simply learned that "clean" sells houses faster, and that's a marketing decision dressed up as a design philosophy.
Coffee shops tell the same story. Walking into an independent cafe once meant walking into someone's specific, slightly chaotic vision: mismatched chairs, bold colors and a personality the space couldn't hide.
Now a "minimalist" cafe in Bloomington, Seoul or Melbourne can look nearly identical: white subway tile, blonde wood, a single monstera plant doing the emotional labor the decor used to do. Now there's a cottage industry built around decanting cereal, rice and snacks into matching acrylic bins, an aesthetic popularized by organizing services like The Home Edit that’s now standard on home organization Instagram accounts. It is worth saying plainly: transferring food from cardboard into clear plastic does not make a kitchen more organized. It makes it more photogenic.
In 2023, McDonald's launched CosMc's, a standalone spinoff with its own yellow-and-blue branding, built around drinks. Craig Burston, a senior lecturer in graphic and media design at the London College of Communication, told Creative Bloq the palette "may have more in common with storage facilities than coffee shops."
McDonald’s shut CosMc’s down in 2025, folding its drinks into the main menu instead of keeping it as different brand.
CosMc's was a side project, but the instinct behind it shows up in the main brand too. Core McDonald’s restaurants have traded their trademark red and yellow for muted tones and flat geometry in newer designs, a shift that Creative Bloq reported left customers baffled.
When a brand built on being loud and cheap starts speaking in whispers, that says less about taste and more about which visual language currently reads as premium.
A fair question in the minimalism debate is whether color matters for child development. The honest answer is that the evidence is thinner than design blogs suggest. Vision experts such as Zsuzsa Kaldy, a psychology professor at the University of Massachusetts Boston, has mentioned that a beige nursery likely won't hinder a baby's development, though some note the muted palette may be visually under stimulating. Between one shade of beige and another, she said, adults may see a difference. Babies won’t.
What is well documented is the trend itself. Houzz, a home renovation and design platform, ran a survey in the United Kingdom with Airbnb that found white is now the most popular children's bedroom color among parents surveyed,overtaking blue and gray. That's a real, measurable shift, and it says more about what parents want their homes to communicate aesthetically than about what their children need.
Ordinary people have absorbed the standard too, redoing kitchens, wardrobes and living rooms not because they personally crave emptiness, but because clutter and color now read as a failure to keep up with trends. A living room full of mismatched furniture and inherited knickknacks used to look lived-in. Now it looks like you haven't gotten around to fixing it.
It’s not that minimalism has nothing to offer. Less clutter and less compulsive buying are real, worthwhile gains.
But there's a difference between owning less and owning the right beige things, and that gap is where the movement lost its footing. Researchers at Columbia Business School have a term for it: "consumer minimalism," the practice of buying items specifically for their minimalist look, clean lines and neutral colors without reducing overall consumption. That isn't restraint. It's consumerism in a quieter outfit.
We didn't get rid of ornament, color and character because they failed us. We got rid of them because a culture focused on appearing effortless will choose the version of "less" that photographs best over the version that actually has sentimental value.
The current minimalist trend, in that sense, isn't minimal at all. It just looks that way.
