Brehm gone ... 'in a way'

Ah, politics. \nChancellor Sharon Brehm has "decided" to step down from her position as chancellor and vice president of academic affairs in order to aid our new president, Adam Herbert, as he wades through the murky waters of administrative restructuring. \nTo many, this comes as a complete surprise. However, Brehm doesn't seem to concur ... "in a way."\n"I think it wasn't a matter of abruptness in some ways," she said. "I think in a way the president and I have been speaking about many issues in the University throughout the beginning of the fall semester."\nYes, exactly. "In a way," this isn't abrupt or a surprise at all. "In a way," we have been expecting this to happen. "In a way," we feel this isn't entirely Brehm's decision.\nAnd what are we hearing about the decision?\nNot much.\nOther than, of course, the acceptable, political answer.\nSo says head of the Bloomington Faculty Council David Daleke: "I understand her position. It's important that the review of the VPA be accomplished without the confusion of the personal review of the person occupying the position."\nHe added, "This shows that she has a deep concern for the University."\nAs if, perhaps, staying on would show a lack of concern? We dare not suppose.\nEspecially since Herbert has asked her to become his new senior adviser in addition to continuing to teach in her area of expertise -- psychology. \nBut why?\nThe only reason we can surmise that would require Brehm's resignation would be her position was considered for, how shall we say, downsizing? Otherwise, why would the position-holder's input conflict with the thorough investigation of options?\nIn the past, this staff has upheld Herbert's proposals for administrative restructuring. But since all positions are under consideration for changes, why exactly is Brehm's decision to step down more necessary than any of the other VPs on campus?\nCould there be ulterior motives here?\nWell, think back to the recent clash between Herbert and Brehm over the cancellation of her search for a provost. Granted, tongues were held in response to that presidential action; we sensed a certain power struggle was taking place -- one that could only end as we see it today.\nIn other words, as an administrative official told IDS reporters, Brehm's new job as "senior adviser" is just a "safe harbor" until she finds employment elsewhere.\nYes, politics indeed.\nWe wouldn't expect any sudden terminations within Herbert's first few months in office, so he is handling this controversy with a grace and poise that is to be praised. We again stress our support for his restructuring initiatives as he hopefully pares back the heavy red tape that has been burdening this University for too long.\nAs for Brehm, we wish her luck. If her departure from this position is best for the University, then we can only stand firmly behind her "decision"