Commentary

In God we trust?

POSTED AT 09:06 PM ON Nov. 19, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (5)

From the dollar bill to the National Anthem, Christianity has always had a dangerous clandestine influence on the decisions of U.S. law makers, politicians and voters – despite the efforts of the Constitution to separate church from state.

However, last week, the Catholic Archdiocese of Washington tried to make its influence on the District of Columbia as overt as possible.

In retaliation to a bill that would legalize gay marriage and make discrimination against homosexuals illegal in the work force, the archdiocese threatened to end all of its charitable contracts with the city. 

Though I might have agreed that the church should not be forced to marry gay couples, as they are not forced to marry any other kind of couple, that’s not what the archdiocese is fighting about. In fact, in the current bill, the church would not even be legally bound to this action. 

Instead, the church is disputing legislation that would only hold them, as well as all other institutions in the city, accountable to laws prohibiting discrimination against homosexuals and the need to extend employee benefits to same-sex married couples.
So where, then, are the Catholic Church’s priorities?

They don’t seem to be for equality or for human rights, and based on their threats, they certainly don’t seem to be for the community – namely the 68,000 impoverished, hungry and homeless they currently serve and will reject if the bill passes.

It seems then, that the archdiocese is simply fighting for the right to discriminate against a minority group with little political or social power, and its main concern is exemption from a law that goes against its “religious freedom.”

But, imagine the implications of awarding a religious institution an exemption from U.S. law – it’s a treacherous proposition indeed. For when God and His followers are exempt from one law, where does it end?

Public stoning or sacrifice? Murder in the name of His Holiness?

Those may sound extreme, but to me, so does the idea of letting religious views and practices be above those of the rest of the nation.

Fortunately, however, members of the District’s city council have bravely and justly stood up to the oppressive intentions of the church.

They are not backing down to the threats of an institution that has tried to use public welfare as political leverage – a stand that will hopefully find its way to other cities and states, like Indiana, where some share this same desire to deny gay couples equal rights.

Allowing religious views to dominate political and legislative decisions is not only dangerous, but unconstitutional.

Let us not forget that America was founded on the freedom of beliefs and ideas – religious or otherwise – and none should hold supremacy against the law or our Constitution.

And though we are already “one nation under God,” let us not become one nation ruled by God.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (5)



POST A COMMENT:



Name:
*
Email:
*
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:

Verify image:
Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (5)

5. Posted by mandyAmanda at 12:11 PM on Nov 21, 2009 | Report this comment

I'm not religious or Catholic, but I definitely think the Catholic Church has every right to do this. If it wants to refuse to do business with those that disagree with its views in an attempt to convince them to change that is totally legitimate. This is a pretty common technique. Campus leftist groups all the time tell universities not to invest in countries or companies that violate some leftist tenet. The No Sweat group wanted IU not to deal with Coke because of Coke's alleged labor practices. I think its legit for groups to do these kinds of things.

4. Posted by Ow at 7:8 AM on Nov 21, 2009 | Report this comment

I doubt anyone here is proposing that, Bob. I think people are saying that governments should not truckle to religious tyranny—and possibly that the Archdiocese is morally bankrupt, given its focus on using "charity" to harm people instead of helping them.

3. Posted by Scott at 2:31 PM on Nov 20, 2009 | Report this comment

In many ways there are exceptions to the law for the religious as it is. 1) Churches don't pay taxes 2) They don't even have to present their books (like a normal charity) 3) Religious exemptions for murder - faith healing laws. I'm all for rolling all of these back, starting with that 3rd one.

2. Posted by Robguy at 5:3 AM on Nov 20, 2009 | Report this comment

This is the primary reason why "faith"-based initiative are such a problem. Public money should never have been given to an organization the discriminates. If they're allowed to skirt the law this time, next time they'll want an exemption from child rape laws. What about my strongly-held religious beliefs? Can I use them in court to avoid the law? I'm sure what ever the particular law, I could find a "congregation" that would back me up. I could even agree to the felonies if I can just get off on the misdemeanors? You don't get to break the law just cuz you don't like it, and the Catholic Church holding the poor hostage just proves how little public trust they deserve.

1. Posted by Bob at 3:2 AM on Nov 20, 2009 | Report this comment

So are you advocating that the Catholic Church be forced to provide charity in support of a government that is impliments a policy they are opposed to on moral grounds? How else can the Church express their dissent to supporting the government?


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | In God we trust?
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*