Commentary

Drug war woes

POSTED AT 08:11 PM ON Nov. 17, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (7)

We tend to forget as a country that our longest and most costly war has been the war on drugs. Many people believe that this is a long-failing battle, and I tend to agree.
This year, drug arrests are expected to exceed 1.8 million people, and law enforcement made more arrests for drug abuse violations than any other crime in the past two years.

In May, the head of the National Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske, said that he wanted to eliminate the idea of a “war on drugs” and instead focus on treatment as opposed to incarceration in order to reduce the drug problem.

This is an important step in the right direction, and I truly hope that Kerlikowske makes effective changes towards this aim.

The war on drugs, besides failing to significantly reduce illicit drug use, also exploits issues such as racism. According to drugpolicy.org, African Americans comprise about 13 percent of total drug users, yet they are 38 percent of the arrests for drug offenses and 59 percent of the convicted offenders.  Instead of alleviating drug problems, our government is unjustly creating further racial rifts. Sadly, it is impossible to talk about the war on drugs without talking about racism. Our drug war repeatedly ignores class and race in its policies, and therefore cannot alleviate many of the underlying factors that contribute to rampant drug abuse.

With talks of nationwide decriminalization and legalization of marijuana, it is absolutely insane that responsible adults are sentenced to serve jail time for using a drug that has been mislabeled as a Schedule I drug, meaning that it has no medicinal use. This is an obvious flaw in the system, and responsible citizens utilizing the drug for medicinal purposes should not be imprisoned due to the mislabeling of the substance.

With Obama’s election, a Web site called the Citizen’s Briefing Book allowed U.S. citizens to voice their opinions on the most important issues in America. The top ideas were to be given to Obama at the inauguration, and the most popular idea was “Ending Marijuana Prohibition.”  

One main reason for the war on drugs is that we need to be protected against certain substances because they are dangerous to our health and are quite simply bad for us. However, with the legality of alcohol and tobacco, this argument stands on shaky ground.

I agree with Kerlikowske that a total change in focus must be taken in order for an effective drug policy to be enacted. By imprisoning mass amounts of drug abusers, the war on drugs becomes a war on the people instead of one for the people. Treatment should be a much higher focus, as opposed to racist arrests that do nothing to truly eliminate the real drug problems in many impoverished areas.

At the very least, the heart of the issue should be drugs and not war.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (7)



POST A COMMENT:



Name:
*
Email:
*
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:

Verify image:
Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (7)

7. Posted by Uncle Sam at 2:21 PM on Nov 29, 2009 | Report this comment

We are a nation addicted to law enforcement and the employees which work for the Justice Department. It isn't that the people are using a natural resource for self medication, it isn't that this use causes crime issues, it is that millions of jobs depend on the continuation of the current unjust and quite frankly, illegal laws. The crime rate goes up with Cannabis use because once you smoke even a single puff, your government is now at war with you, and you are now a criminal. The other crimes then are placed on a equal level as smoking some weeds. There are lesser sentences if you commit violent crime verse longer ones for selling a weed. Speeding does not make you a criminal, yet it kills. Follow the money spent to see who is profiting, its not just the Drug Cartels. It isn't that this can't change, it is the profit behind the problem of labeling a health giving, life sustaining plant free for all to grow. I call it Discrimination of the last unclassified minority group called the Hippies.

6. Posted by Dan at 3:0 PM on Nov 18, 2009 | Report this comment

There's nothing funny about folks being locked up for smoking a plant. Marijuana is not addictive and its effects don't even compare with alcohol. 50% of Americans are "guilty" of using it. Michael Phelps. Barack Obama. Bill Clinton. Louis Armstrong. The list goes on... There was less of a problem when these drugs were legal than there is today. Ending this war is long past due; it is unwinnable, has caused serious sociopolitical problems (look at American minorities -- look at Columbia or Mexico!) and should have never even started. Reefer Madness is an entertaining movie but a poor basis for policy.

5. Posted by Butler at 12:0 PM on Nov 18, 2009 | Report this comment

Debrockman it is you that has the cart before the horse. When young men are targeted by police for doing nothing being a minority and receive criminal records and lose any educational assistance for acts that hurt no one but themselves, their life has been taken from them. They are no longer employable and are destined for a life of crime. I do not understand how people like can not see that the laws against marijuana in particular create crime and poverty rather than prevent it.

4. Posted by AntiNeoFascist at 9:31 AM on Nov 18, 2009 | Report this comment

@debrockman: Of course in a sea of prohibition, islands of tolerance will generate increased use. In fact, if all drugs were legalized, you would see an initial spike in overall usage, but that would eventually return to historic levels (especially if the money spent on enforcement of prohibition were to be spent in dissuasion, treatment, and rehabilitation). And yes, rehabilitation can work, but not when it's mandated against the person's will. You cannot rehabilitate someone who doesn't want to be rehabilitated. For more statistics on the "success" of the drug war see: http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/is-drug-prohibition-worth-it

3. Posted by debrockman at 9:22 AM on Nov 18, 2009 | Report this comment

Bill, Nice try. Unfortunately, one of the reasons why we have so many poor crime ridden neighborhoods is BECAUSE of drugs. Once you are an addict, it is very difficult to acquire and hold a responsible job, let alone graduate from high school. Your dependency and lack of resources also make you far more likely to inflict violence on your neighbors to feed your habit. You have the chicken and the egg completely backward. I suggest that everyone take a look at the facts about drug enforcement policy. Take a look at your own university. Look at universities that do not take as tolerant a stand on drugs (including alcohol). I think I can show you pretty conclusively that tolerance yields higher use. Drug liberalization advocates have been lying so long about the "racism" of drug policy that they believe their own lies. There is no doubt that in ADDITION to enforcement, there needs to be a lot more treatment. I'm all for it. But the argument that somehow because we have been too soft on alcohol and prescription drug abuse that we need to liberalize non-prescription drug laws is a straw man. For more of the history and the facts: http://www.justice.gov/dea/demand/speakout/ Don't believe the lie. And one more great idea. If you want to improve your grades at IU. Stop drinking your life away. It isn't nearly as cute as you think it is. And it's holding you back from being your best.

2. Posted by Bill's Ghost at 8:54 AM on Nov 18, 2009 | Report this comment

What doesn’t work is incarceration. Drug addiction is a two-fold problem: psychological and physical. Jail time addresses neither of these. Tossing someone in the slammer to suffer through withdrawal symptoms, in my mind, qualifies as cruel and unusual punishment. The War on Drugs is typical American policy making: duck the heart of the issue while dealing as half-assed as possible with the symptoms in a way that fuels society fears and stokes the Puritanical flames that still feed so much of the American mindset; meanwhile, do you what you want. One has only to look at the Iran-Contra affair that occurred right in the midst of Reagan’s “Just Say No Program” to see that even the government knows the War on Drugs is crap. There is no need to continue our status as the country with the highest percentage of its population incarcerated; especially when a large number of that percentage is behind bars simply for being sick, poor, and black. Not to mention all the money wasted on enforcement and military-style action that has done nothing to curb the drug problem, the environment impact in impoverished countries from our use of aerial fumigation, the creation of a perpetual underclass through the ruining of youthful offenders lives, and the increasing medical costs incurred by people who are on doctor proscribed Schedule II drugs (like Ritalin) and forced to visit their physician every month for regulatory reasons and not out of any medical necessity. Finally to quote Bill Hicks, “That's what I hate about the war on drugs. All day long we see those commercials: ‘Here's your brain, here's your brain on drugs’, ‘Just Say No’, ‘Why do you think they call it dope?’ … And then the next commercial is ‘This Bud’s for youuuu.’ C'mon, everybody, let's be hypocritical bastards. It's okay to drink your drug. We meant those other drugs. Those untaxed drugs. Those are the ones that are bad for you.”

1. Posted by mandyAmanda at 1:57 AM on Nov 18, 2009 | Report this comment

I think marijuana should be legal. But for the other stuff, put them in jail. Also, I don't support rehabilitation over incarcertation. Honestly, rehabilitation doesn't work. Basically this is just a way to direct money from jailers to psychologists. Since I dont think it makes a difference either way, I'd rather the money go to whichever group is more Republican and less Democrat. Anway, Legalize pot, but everyone else in jail. Also drug dealers should get the death penalty.


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Drug war woes
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*