Commentary

Straight shootin’

POSTED AT 08:15 PM ON Nov. 16, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (8)

Today, hockey-mom turned governor turned vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin will release her much-anticipated memoir, “Going Rogue: An American Life.”

Her book, which reaches shelves today, has spent 50 days on Amazon.com’s top 100 and has already sold more than a million advance copies. “Going Rogue” even elbowed out James Patterson, Dan Brown and “SuperFreakonomics” to claim Amazon’s bestseller’s top spot. 

Perhaps I’m old fashioned, but I thought autobiographies were the sort of things that old, dying people scraped together to preserve a memory of their legacy – not another way to cash in on a waning 15 minutes of fame.

I’m thinking of some of the great autobiographies of old. Benjamin Franklin was 82 when he finished his. Gandhi published his when he was 58.  Malcolm X was only 39 when he finished relating his story to Alex Haley, but he had been threatened with assassination several times. He was shot and killed in 1965 – the same year that his autobiography was published.

Nowadays everyone writes an autobiography – and soon. Bill Clinton has one. Hillary does, too. President Obama’s first book of memoirs hit shelves in 1995 – when he was just 34 years old.

Even 16-year-old Miley Cyrus already has an autobiography under her belt. Too bad “Miles to Go” probably came out before her 10th-grade teacher could explain that Robert Frost allusion.

And can you blame them? Autobiographies are a booming business, even in a difficult economy.

Palin reportedly received $5 million just to pen her personal history, not to mention the money she’ll rake in when the royalties come rolling.

Still, I think it’s funny that 45-year-old Palin is so quick to come out with her memoirs. If all the buzz about a 2012 run is even remotely true, why not wait a few more years, accomplish a little more and then put out a book with some substance?

Even if she did wait, I probably wouldn’t put a lot of stock in the gospel of Palin according to Palin. But then again, I don’t put much stock in any autobiography anyway.

Famed British biographer Humphrey Carpenter once called autobiographies “the most respectable form of lying.” 

And I think he got it right.

The problem about memoirs of any sort is that there are fundamental credibility issues. Since no one likes to think of themselves in a negative light, everyone either consciously or unconsciously prunes and edits the first-draft of their thoughts. So by the time they make it onto the paper, it is hard to decipher the credible from the edited.

Ultimately, autobiographies are interesting not for what they tell us, but often for what they leave out, which means we all must be vigilant readers in order to separate fact from fabrication. 

So for all of you who already have your hands on a copy of “Going Rogue,” I challenge you to think about not only what our favorite maverick princess is saying, but also why she might be saying it.

Fortunately, the book of Sarah can’t possibly be very long.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (8)



POST A COMMENT:



Name:
*
Email:
*
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:

Verify image:
Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (8)

8. Posted by mandyAmanda at 10:0 PM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

I voted for McCain but Palin is way out of her league. I do think the media is sometimes too harsh with her (journalists are slime, all the time) but seriously that woman had no business being Vice President. Think about it, if McCain bought the farm, Palin and her wacko religious views would be president. That's bad. I voted for McCain despite Palin -- as bad as Palin is, Obama and Biden are worse. But that's hardly praise. Obama is a truly disgusting human being. Palin is merely a moron.

7. Posted by Common Sense at 2:17 PM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

"Secondly, I think 'A friend' may have sensed a double standard since people like Rosie O'Donnell, and even Michelle and Barack Obama have all also writen their stories at, I believe, a younger age than Palin, but without claims of "Is it too soon?"." Both Bill and Hillary Clinton were mentioned by name in the column, with the suggestion that they'd written their respective memoirs too early. What more could ANF possibly want in requesting fair play than the two biggest Democrat names they cried about during the eight years of GWB? Again, quit whining and playing the victim. The complaints against the opinion column have so far been completely inaccurate and childish.

6. Posted by AntiNeoFascist at 1:35 PM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

Firstly, I think now is the perfect time for this book since Palin feels very misunderstood by the general public due, largely she feels, to restrictions placed on her by the McCain campaign, and inaccurate portrayals of her and her actions in the media. That makes it easy to understand why she would want to set the record straight by giving her side of the story (which if I'm not mistaken, is primarily about the presidential campaign). Secondly, I think 'A friend' may have sensed a double standard since people like Rosie O'Donnell, and even Michelle and Barack Obama have all also writen their stories at, I believe, a younger age than Palin, but without claims of "Is it too soon?". Not to mention the condescending dismissal and other remarks like it "can't possibly be very long."

5. Posted by Common Sense at 1:2 PM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

Of course, 'a friend' jumps off the cliff before reading the column. Otherwise he/she would've noticed that nobody is downing Republicans (even in the comments), or even a Republican who wrote a book, but rather questioning how early an autobiography is being written. Furthermore, I'm not suggesting something is wrong with her book being a bestseller before it's release. I'm stating an indisputable fact - one reason her numbers are up the way they are is the bulk ordering. You don't have to take my word for it - you can go to any online book seller and see where the numbers are coming from. That you have an aversion to, and want to play victim in light of, those facts, is, well, your problem.

4. Posted by A friend at 11:39 AM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

What happened to NOT judging a book by it's over? Yes, Sarah Palin wrote an autobiography, what a travesty. You people preach about being "tolerant" and all that feel-good fluff, but when it comes down to it, when a member of the Republican party writes a book, and it becomes a best-seller even before it's actual release date, obviously something isn't right with that. Did you ever pause to think that maybe people aren't incredibly happy with the current presidential administration and are looking for something and someone else to represent their voice in 2012? Let's be a little more tolerant towards the viewpoint of this group of people, and in the interim, stop criticizing a book that you will never read.

3. Posted by Tom at 11:13 AM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

Common Sense is correct. If you go to the NYT bestseller list and look at the bottom you will see the information regarding the type of sales. A dagger (†) indicates that some bookstores report receiving bulk orders.

2. Posted by Common Sense at 10:4 AM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

"They only get printed becuase people choose to purchase and read these books." Or because pro-Palin groups, like Focus on the Family, order large quantities of them to get the numbers up for bestseller lists. Then again, why let a little intellectual dishonesty get in the way of a good 'gotcha'

1. Posted by RC at 8:58 AM on Nov 17, 2009 | Report this comment

They only get printed becuase people choose to purchase and read these books. Isn't America great! People actually get to vote with their dollars...that is unless Uncle Sam takes them first.


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Straight shootin’
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*