Commentary

Indecision reigns supreme

POSTED AT 09:17 PM ON Nov. 4, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (4)

“This is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity,” President Obama said on Aug. 17.

They say actions speak louder than words, and based on the lack of action that the Obama administration has taken during the last few months, all I hear is silence.

It is now approaching ten months since President Obama has taken office, and America still lacks any vision, goal or strategy for how to proceed in Afghanistan.
On Oct. 18, Rahm Emanuel said Obama is now asking questions about Afghanistan “that have never been asked on the civilian side, the political side, the military side and the strategic side.” I would love to hear just one question that Obama has asked that takes 10 months to answer.

The quote also seemed aimed to deflect criticism by blaming the Bush administration for the current troubles. Well Obama, I get it, Bush sucked. Now what are you going to do about it?

Recently I watched a Frontline episode titled “Obama’s War,” and the realities of the situation on the ground became extremely apparent to me. While the soldiers did capture the town they were targeting, that was only the beginning of the fight as the Taliban used daily hit and run tactics to kill Americans without being seen. 

Even though the soldiers knew the general area where they were basing their attacks, they lacked the manpower to pursue the Taliban. So, they stayed and remained sitting ducks.

In one scene, the cameras took footage of 20-year-old Lance Corporal Charles Sharp lying dead on the ground, shot in the neck, while his friends begged him to come back. While watching this, I realized the only point that really matters right now is that people are dying.

Since Obama has taken office, more than 265 U.S. soldiers have been killed. Even more troubling, about 100 of those have died since Gen. McChrystal sent his assessment back in August.

Despite this, Obama continues to dither with indecision.

Recently, he has blamed this delay on continuing questions surrounding the legitimacy of the Afghan government, and Rahm Emanuel questioned “whether, in fact, there’s an Afghan partner.” It has even been reported by the Wall Street Journal that Obama refused to take a call from Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

However, this stall tactic is ridiculous since it would take months for any chosen strategy to be put in place; well after any runoff election has taken place. And with Abdullah pulling out of the runoff this past weekend, this matter is now over.

It seems instead that Obama is waiting and hoping for a miracle strategy to form. It has been reported that the Pentagon was asked to draft arguments making the best case for Vice-President Biden’s counter-terror approach, but the strategists had difficulties writing out a credible case, so members of Biden’s staff stepped in to write the document themselves. I’m sure Biden’s secretary is qualified to formulate U.S. strategy.

Regardless of whether Obama chooses to surge or pull out, the decision needs to be made. He has all the facts in front of him, and while they aren’t pretty and the decision isn’t easy, the troops deserve better than a sitting-duck strategy.
Making tough decisions is what Obama was elected for. Seriously, it’s been 10 months.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (4)





Name: *
Email: *
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (4)

Posted by Alan at 9:49 PM on Nov 05, 2009 | Report this comment

"We knew what Bush's stated objectives were." That's more than Bush knew.... "Lets kick him out of office and get someone better." Like Glenn, Rush, Sean or Sarah?

Posted by mandyAmanda at 7:3 PM on Nov 05, 2009 | Report this comment

Obama is a complete imbecile and it is a shame he is our president. Lets kick him out of office and get someone better.

Posted by Bob at 6:56 PM on Nov 05, 2009 | Report this comment

We have been in Afghanistan for 8 years. What is our current strategy? It is not up to the military to determine strategy. It is the responsibility of President Obama, Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Security Council to determine National Strategy. That Strategy is given to the Military Commander to create an Operational Plan to accomplish stated Strategic Goals in the Area of Responsibility. Resources such as subject matter experts in Culture, Economy, Politics and Military matters specific to the region are required in conjunction with material and personnel to accomplish the will of the American people. We knew what Bush's stated objectives were. What is the strategic objective for America in Afghanistan now? Pakistan? What about our relations with China and India? What will be the impact of Pakistan in China’s sphere of influence do to our National Strategic objectives in the Far East? What about our objectives in the Middle East in relation to Pakistan and China?

Posted by Jared Stancombe at 10:0 AM on Nov 05, 2009 | Report this comment

As an Afghan scholar, I would have to say that you are dead wrong. Dead wrong. Please read up on "complex military operations" and write an editorial that actually reflects reality. Its a hard decision, and will pave the way for the next several DECADES of military strategy in Afghanistan. Sending more troops just to send more troops is what happened in Vietnam. Matt Gorman, please do not write any more editorials on Afghanistan.


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Indecision reigns supreme
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*