Commentary

Don’t ask, don’t tell

POSTED AT 09:54 PM ON Oct. 26, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (5)

The President campaigned for extending equality for all Americans.

While some of his ideas were fundamentally flawed even then – like his refusal to support same-sex marriage – I am realistic enough to admit that for now, no viable candidate for the presidency can be in favor of same-sex marriage and win.

He did, however, pledge to overturn “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the rule that prohibits gay people from openly serving in the military, as well as the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law that doesn’t require states to recognize the gay marriages performed in other states where it is legal.

Far from doing this, the President has actually instructed federal attorneys to support the Defense of Marriage Act in a court case suing the federal government over its constitutionality and has done nothing to end the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that was implemented in the 1990s.

Needless to say, this is exactly the opposite of the progress that Obama promised less than a year ago. 

Since the implementation of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in 1994, more than 13,500 gay men and women have been unfairly discharged from the military.

The University of California estimates that the cost of retraining replacements for the discharged soldiers has been at least $190.5 million.

At least 59 critically-needed Arabic and Farsi linguists have been discharged.
So what, exactly, is the justification for all of this? So that straight soldiers won’t feel queasy or uneasy when they see how well-decorated their neighbor’s bunk is? We don’t need to actually protect them from things like, you know, bullets or bombs.
Keeping them from having to deal with diversity is close enough. 

This assertion that the military couldn’t handle having gays is not only absurd, but completely untrue.

According to a Zogby poll from December of 2006, 64 percent of soldiers report that they do not think that having openly gay soldiers in their unit would negatively impact them, and only 37 percent of soldiers are against the idea of allowing gays to openly serve.

And to top it all off, dozens of prominent military leaders have come out (pun intended) in favor of lifting the ban, including retired general and former Secretary of State Colin Powell, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John M. Shalikashvili, and former Secretary of Defense William Cohen, all Republicans. 

So if the military isn’t even against it, why haven’t politicians repealed it yet?
Do they fear the wrath of voters in the religious right? If so, they have nothing to fear. Even majorities of weekly churchgoers (60 percent), conservatives (58 percent) and Republicans (58 percent) favor outright repeal of this discriminatory and unjustifiable policy. 

When the religious right is more gay-friendly than the Democrats in power, something is seriously wrong.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (5)





Name: *
Email: *
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (5)

Posted by Alex at 9:13 PM on Oct 31, 2009 | Report this comment

It's very hard to belive there are still people out there with opinions like those posted on here (Bob). The military is one of the most diverse cultures around, it takes people from different geographical area's, backgrounds, religions, and lifestyles and teaches them to work as a team and it does so very successfully. So how is it possible that adding an additional segment of the population could harm the military. The small unit leadership is already well trained, prepared, and practiced in taking young men and women of different back grounds and making them a cohesive unit. Your actually not even adding anything there are already members of the armed forces that serve openly. And to Trent I would say you are wrong as well most of your comment seems to be coming for a suprioriety complexe and your own feelings, are you really implying that members of our military and lower class citizens, or even that person who come from lower socio-economic backgrounds are not capable of accepting people of different backgrounds? Again the military itself imperically disproves that. It is time that this reliec of what was a "compromise" is repealed.

Posted by mandyAmanda at 8:38 PM on Oct 27, 2009 | Report this comment

I'm a conservative but I think people should be allowed to have sex with (and oral sex too) whomever they want. Its just not my business. Now, I don't have anything to say about Don't Ask Don't Tell. I hope one day we will have a society where that policy is not needed. Whether the policy is needed now to keep military discipline I don't know. I'm not a military expert. But I just wanted to post to say that there are conservatives who have no problem with gays or straights or whomever. People should be allowed to have sex with whomever they want. Oral and anal too for all i care. And nobody should be forced to have sex with someone they don't want to. As a conservative, I believe we have more pressing problems than the supposed evil of homosexuality. Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with being gay, but even if there is, I think that is an issue for the individual. As a society, we should stay out of people's bedrooms. Aso - conservatives need to do a better job of reaching out to gay or lesbian people. I think there are a lot of good conservative ideas, but we don't need to taint the conservative movement by associating it with moronic prejudiced anti-gay vitriol. Thank you.

Posted by Sandra at 7:39 PM on Oct 27, 2009 | Report this comment

You all are homophobes!!!

Posted by Trent at 5:6 PM on Oct 27, 2009 | Report this comment

Bob, I completely agree with you. Today's military isn't as "progressive" as college students. In fact, I've served and the common enlisted soldier I have dealt with are lower class people who joined b/c it was their best option. I am not afraid of going into combat with any gay person, but I also do not want my sergeants dealing with that issue.

Posted by Bob at 3:33 AM on Oct 27, 2009 | Report this comment

You don't understand the small unit leader implications of overturning don't ask don't tell. The military is made up of predominantly 18 - 19 year old men and women. Those who choose a GLBT life style in colleges are still meeting resistance from the enlightened college community. The military has a tough enough time integrating diverse cultures, genders, religions and nationalities; all attributes that a person was born with. GLBT is a life style choice. There are implications to choosing a life style contrary to the accepted norms and values of any society. Until the norms of our American society catch-up, please let the military continue to work on the complex challenges facing them currently. The small unit leader is charged with integrating the men and women to accomplish challenging requirements while teaching them to set aside their differences and come together as a team.


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Don’t ask, don’t tell
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*