Campus

Panel debates atheist morals

POSTED AT 12:18 AM ON Oct. 20, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (16)

Students and community members filled the Woodburn Hall auditorium Monday for a debate about the controversial Bloomington Transit bus advertisement, which says “You can be good without God.”

The debate featured Dan Barker, co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, who discussed the merits of the atheist ad campaign with Dan Waugh, pastor of Adult Ministries at the Evangelical Community Church in Bloomington.

“There is no absolute moral guideline in the Bible,” Barker said in his opening remarks. “If you are motivated to be a good person because of the promise of heaven, that shows how little you think of others.”

The debate was highlighted by varying moments of humor and tension. Barker drew surprised gasps from some audience members when he called out Waugh for practicing faith in vain, calling his God a “petty, vain, insecure, egotistical being.”

Barker’s arguments centered around the idea that morality is a human trait, defined by the goal of minimizing harm. He said that there is no purpose of life, only purpose in life.

Waugh responded by saying “good is a function of purpose. If there is no God, then all that is left is nature, and nature cannot communicate meaning or purpose.”

The debate, which was co-sponsored by the Secular Alliance of IU, the Evangelical Community Church and the Indiana Atheist Bus Campaign, centered on the moral question posed by the bus advertisement rather than the reasons for or against running the ad.

“I’m not against the campaign at all, I welcome it,” Waugh said. “It allows for this debate, it is not a threat.”

The mood changed when Barker asked Waugh a question.

“If God told you to, would you kill me?” Barker asked.

The question drew laughter from the audience and a pause from Waugh.

“If there was a specific verse saying Dan Waugh should kill Dan Barker, then I would have to consider it,” Waugh responded, drawing more laughter and applause from the filled auditorium.

Joe Hughto, president of the IU Secular Alliance, was pleased with the choice of both Waugh and Barker to participate in the debate.

“The whole point of this ad was not to convert people. It was to start this debate,” he said. “We wanted to make it balanced, we wanted to find people with strong convictions who wouldn’t back down from their views.”

Hughto was also pleased with the full crowd turnout.

“I thought we had a good mix of people, both secular humanists and believers,” he said.

Eoban Binder, co-founder of the Secular Alliance, also appreciated the direction and tone of the debate.

“The discussion, debate and argument about this topic can sometimes degrade into something unproductive. Everyone has a lot to gain from this debate,” he said.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (16)





Name: *
Email: *
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (15)

Posted by Sara at 3:10 PM on Oct 26, 2009 | Report this comment

Posted by Chosen One "If not for Religious Morals there would be no morals at all." Please explain to me why only 2% of people in prison are atheists.

Posted by Larian LeQuella at 12:5 PM on Oct 24, 2009 | Report this comment

A better question I think would be, how the heck can a xtian be good by believing in god? Honestly, the guy is a frikkin monster: http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/fundamentals/bible_moral_guide.html

Posted by TC at 9:27 AM on Oct 24, 2009 | Report this comment

THEY BELIEVE THERE IS A GOD. Sigh, Thinking for them,

Posted by JF at 8:26 AM on Oct 23, 2009 | Report this comment

Thanks for posting the link Megan!

Posted by Steve Schlicht at 2:4 PM on Oct 21, 2009 | Report this comment

There is simply no evidence for the existence of any of the purported God(s)ess(es) and so the determination is reasonably made that there are no such beings based on the dubious elements in the claims of the assorted religious adherents. In short, the burden of proof is on the believer in such things to present supportive evidence for their religious claim. I couldn't very well run around telling people I can flap my arms and fly to the top of the Empire State building and then demand that *they* have to prove that I can't do any such thing. Within reasonable and acceptable certainty they'd say, "I don't have to prove to you that you *can't* fly. YOU go ahead and try to prove that you *can* do it!" The same principle applies to the claims of religious adherents of any belief system.

Posted by Brit Brat at 11:3 AM on Oct 21, 2009 | Report this comment

THEY BELIEVE THERE IS NO GOD. Sigh, Praying for them,

Posted by Megan at 11:6 PM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

The debate podcast can be downloaded here: http://wfhb.org/news/can-you-be-good-without-god It's worth a listen.

Posted by momintum at 8:54 PM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

Many societies with no knowledge of the Judeo-Christian religion still practice compassion and fundamental moral obligations. Religion has been a millstone around the neck of humanity for millenia. A very brief examination of historical and current events will be more than adequate to verify this claim. Chained within a prison of ignorance to walls of guilt and intolerance religions have, and will continue to erode the harmony and balance of humanity. Evolving into a new culture, society and civilization need no longer be bound into this darkness but step toward the light of reason and logic. Gods are very delicate things and can usually be sent back under the bed or into the closet with a teaspoon of logic followed by a cup of reason

Posted by Steve Schlicht at 4:8 PM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

Excellent article! As a loving husband (married 20 years this December!), father of three great kids, veteran police officer, community service volunteer and an atheist, it is very good to see that there is a new trend toward reasonable civil debate over such important issues regarding morality and ethics between atheists and theists. Steve Schlicht Biloxi MS

Posted by alum at 3:31 PM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

And here I was thinking the Bible taught us not to judge others . . . . In full disclosure I didn't attend this and can only go by what's reported here.

Posted by Chosen One at 2:18 PM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

If not for Religious Morals there would be no morals at all. The perfect example of that is the rate of problems in Public Schools since God has been removed. Everything is the same if not for morals Running over a person is no different than avoiding them if there is no morality. George Washington was persistant in his belief that religion must be included in Government.

Posted by Jessika Griffin at 9:51 AM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

I felt like Dan Waugh didn't do well to prove his point. I wish I would have thought to tally each time he said something that completely contradicted a previous statement, or voided his argument completely. I love watching debates like these, but I always feel like the religious side never makes a good argument, which is sad considering it's more interesting when both sides are very strong.

Posted by Chris Marella at 9:35 AM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

Looks like John Irvine is also Chris Marella. You're an idiot.

Posted by Scott at 3:45 AM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

Now, now, Mr. Irvine. As an atheist I know my share of alcoholic, hypocritical, overweight, and inarticulate atheists. And here you are, demonstrating that we don't have any etiquette, either! Shame on you!

Posted by John Irvine at 1:30 AM on Oct 20, 2009 | Report this comment

There shouldn't be reason for a debate. Religion is just a money making ploy that people buy into. These people are alcoholics, hypocrites, in pathetic physical shape, can hardly construct a sentence, and pray to an invisible man in the sky. I'm the best in the world today and I dare anyone to challenge it.


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Panel debates atheist morals
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*