Commentary

A fond farewell

POSTED AT 08:14 PM ON Apr. 27, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (5)

I’ve never been very good at saying goodbye, so it’s with a heavy heart that I write my final column for the Indiana Daily Student.

I refuse to make this a self-congratulatory space or an outlet for cheesy farewells to my wonderful editors and the friends I’ve made while working for the paper. Rather, I’d like to share a story that may better illustrate the thrust of my ideological underpinnings.

I’ve made no secret about the fact that I’ve been a recovering conservative for three years now. I shudder to think of the days when I called Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman my intellectual heroes, but I blame it on the foolishness of my youth.

While I was still impressionable, I read a book by John Rawls titled “A Theory of Justice,” and to say that it changed my life is an understatement. After finishing the often-complicated text, I realized two things.

One: Conservatism had deluded me into accepting the very worst of humanity as not simply an outlier but the very apotheosis of our existence. This led me to my second realization: I was mistakenly embracing an ideology that rejected the notion of human dignity and compassion as the source of our progress.

As I mulled over these ideas, I witnessed the manifestation of these ruminations, beginning with Hurricane Katrina and the governmental response to it. The conservative principles of self-reliance and callousness were on wondrous display then, and in the months following that disaster, I no longer identified with the movement.

There is a point to this long and somewhat dramatic story, and it is this: While it is good to be principled and take a stand, it is just as important to allow room to change one’s mind. This ability to challenge and confront one’s existing world view, in essence, is the role of the opinion writer.

Owing to plentiful negative feedback I have received from detractors, I can only assume that I achieved this goal.

Sadly, pushing and prodding one’s various intellectual faculties remains a task that is highly unattractive. Particularly as college students, we are content with accepting the knowledge handed down to us.

Such adherence to authority is the antithesis of a liberal arts education, and yet we derive little satisfaction from curiosity. Going against the status quo has always been the hallmark of liberalism, and it is perhaps no coincidence that many opinion columnists are left-leaning.

Most importantly, in my time as an opinion writer, I’ve understood that as a highly biased consumer of news, I was often charged with acting as a gatekeeper for ideas.

Sometimes I succeeded, and often I failed. But what I learned was that the ability to ask questions and challenge students saved me and countless others from a future of ignorance.

I would hope that this sense of open-mindedness fostered by the opinion page continues to flourish long after the departure of graduating columnists. More than anything, dear readers, please don’t stop thinking – it might help you see the light as well.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (5)



POST A COMMENT:



Name:
*
Email:
*
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:

Verify image:
Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (5)

5. Posted by Kim at 3:48 PM on Apr 28, 2009 | Report this comment

Capitalism, per se, does not need to be callous. Billions are spent on all kinds of welfare measures. Some say we work half the year to pay taxes of one kind or another. We very well might have failed the people of Katrina. I'm not sure another mode of government would have done better or if it was the current mode that is to blame. Milton Friedman contributed his lifetime earnings to his foundation for school vouchers, feeling that improving education was the most important thing he could do. You might disagree with his idea of vouchers, but certainly his intention is anything but callous. He used to say that a socialist before 35 would become a capitalist after 35. I wonder how old you are when you attribute your naivete to your age.

4. Posted by Harry Binswanger at 12:23 PM on Apr 28, 2009 | Report this comment

It looks like you are conceding that Ayn Rand was right on a deeper level: capitalism is incompatible with the primordial morality of altruism. You are clinging to altruism, the notion that the only justification of your existence is sacrificial service to others. (Why these others are one's lord and master, when they are likewise serfs, is one of many unanswered questions Rand poses to altruism). Altruism leads you to make startling statements, such as that compassion is the source of progress. Whatever things compassion--commiseration with the suffering of others--may lead to, progress ain't one of them. When Ayn Rand was your hero, didn't you read Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead? Both novelse demonstrate how progress stems from the rational mind, the self-interested pursuit of productive achievement. Do you think Howard Roark moved architecture forward by means of "compassion"? Or that John Galt invented his revolutionary motor out of pity? Your column rightly champions independent thought. But altruism makes that impossible: "the most selfish of all things is the independent mind that recognizes no authority higher than its own and no value higher than its judgment of truth." (Atlas Shrugged)

3. Posted by anwar at 11:40 AM on Apr 28, 2009 | Report this comment

This is a touching and elegant column. Thank you for all the thought provoking over the years!

2. Posted by jackdoitcrawford at 11:34 AM on Apr 28, 2009 | Report this comment

The public not only don't know the difference between Fascism and Socialism, they also don't understand what Capitalism is. That is why, "Capitalism, The Unknown Ideal" by Ayn Rand is such an important book. What we have is a very MIXED economic system with a multitude of controls and a few remnants of freedom left over from the rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that were proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence. You should learn how the private industrialists rebuilt the city of San Francisco after the 1903 earthquake and fire. Contrast that to Katrina and you might learn something. Most children are honest, until they grow up.

1. Posted by A Faithful Reader at 5:35 AM on Apr 28, 2009 | Report this comment

I'm going to miss your column!


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | A fond farewell
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*