Campus

Faculty council regrets Pace honor

Story Image

The Associated Press

Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, retired Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace greets portrait artist Peter E. Egeli following the unveiling of Pace's portrait. The portrait was unveiled Friday during a ceremony at the Pentagon. The painting will be displayed in a corridor of the Pentagon along with portraits of other former chairmen.

POSTED AT 11:54 PM ON Feb. 17, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (8)

The Bloomington Faculty Council passed a resolution Tuesday stating it regrets the Kelley School of Business’ decision to honor former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Peter Pace with the position of Poling Chair.

The resolution expresses the council’s “regret that Gen. Pace was brought to campus in a way that was offensive to the gay and lesbian community, and urges all campus administrators to be sensitive to minority concerns when awarding university honors.”
In a 2007 interview with the Chicago Tribune, Pace said he believed “homosexual acts” were “immoral.”

Council President Herb Terry said 19 members voted for the resolution and 15 voted against. He also said many council members at the meeting did not vote.

“The members of the faculty council are very heterogeneous, so I think many of them had very different reasons for voting for it to pass,” Terry said.

The resolution will now be sent to campus administrators, but Terry said he is unsure of the impact it will have.

The decision came after a debate between council members.

Before the vote, various council members brought up questions about the purpose of the resolution to Alex Tanford, the chair of the Diversity and Affirmative Action Committee, which drafted the resolution.

Most of the council members who spoke out about the resolution were against it. One member of the Diversity and Affirmative Action Committee, Michael Morrone, said he has opposed the resolution from the beginning.

“One of the big problems with this resolution is that there are so many interpretations,” Morrone said.

The council also discussed a memorandum submitted by the Kelley School of Business that asked for the withdrawal of the resolution.

But after about an hour of back-and-forth questioning, the council moved to end discussion and vote on the resolution.

Brian Horne, a member of the council and an associate professor of voice in the Jacobs School of Music, said he was glad the Diversity and Affirmative Action Committee rewrote the resolution, but he said he still wished the resolution had not passed because it could create a “chilling effect.”

“The Kelley School was so spanked by this, so punished by this, I believe that anybody in the future will back away – not most certainly from anybody with this controversial viewpoint, but any controversial viewpoint – because they don’t want to be scrutinized by this body in that way,” Horne said. “That’s not what a university should do.”

But Terry, who said his field of research is self-expression, said he did not think the resolution will have that impact.

He said he voted to pass the resolution because of how it was written.

“If I believed that this resolution would have any chilling effect on the invitation of people to come to campus ... or for the University to give them a minor honor like the Poling Chair, then I would have voted against it,” Terry said. “But I don’t think it will have that effect based on the resolution.”

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (8)





Name: *
Email: *
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (8)

Posted by Mike at 10:20 PM on Feb 20, 2009 | Report this comment

how pathetic of IU, pandering to everything PC once again. PATHETIC.

Posted by Another student at 1:9 PM on Feb 19, 2009 | Report this comment

The fact is - General Pace made comments that puts down the lives of lesbian and gay people. That sort of commentary does not create the right kind of campus climate for students. No community on campus should ever be told that their lives are immoral. The thing is - General Pace can be honored (despite his comments) because in the eyes of the nation, and this campus now, lesbians and gays are viewed as second-class citizens by the majority. And consider it this way -- If General Pace had said that Black Americans were immoral -- Do you think the black community on campus just sit back and take that? No, of course not. If someone were to say that -- it would be viewed as hateful and contrary to the campus's interests. In this country, and sadly on this campus, lesbian and gay people continue to be wrongly viewed as subhuman and unworthy of respect. This "honoring" of General Pace perpetuates that unfortunate idea. IU should not be honoring people who perpetuate hateful ideas.

Posted by Nate at 11:38 AM on Feb 19, 2009 | Report this comment

He said that he believed that homosexuality is immoral, not that he hates homosexuals. You're drawing conclusions that simply aren't backed up by facts. I don't agree with Gen. Pace, but the fact that his own moral opinions can have a deciding factor on whether or not he can be honored is ridiculous. If the school were to say that abortion is immoral (yeah right at this Libtard university) would we not be allowed to honor a pro-life person?

Posted by geomancer at 10:27 AM on Feb 19, 2009 | Report this comment

Exercising one's right to free speech does not make one a bigot. As a Christian, I agree with Pace's view on homosexuality but I also agree that we are called to love everybody and rid our own lives of sin before we try to "fix" other people. Regrettably, I have a lifetime of my own brokenness to deal with and have no business throwing stones at others in this world - regardless of their sexual orientation. How sad that Christians are so well known for what they don't believe in rather than what they do believe.

Posted by Another student at 1:37 AM on Feb 19, 2009 | Report this comment

You have to look at what Pace said. He called homosexuality immoral. Let's think about it this way -- If General Pace had been criticizing heterosexuals as immoral -- Would that have been okay? No, of course not. It would be viewed as hateful. Or for instance -- If General Pace had been criticizing Jewish students as immoral -- Would that have been okay? No, of course not. It would be viewed as hateful. And it's the same here. General Pace shows a clear bias against a group of people -- and that's not right. It influences his decisions, and it's bigotry.

Posted by Nate at 11:51 PM on Feb 18, 2009 | Report this comment

So anyone with a differing opinion than that of the faculty now has questionable views? Sorry people, I went to Pace's speach, and the man knows about leadership, and THAT'S what he was here to talk about. IU isn't saying Pace is right or wrong in his views on homosexuality, they're honoring a man who served this country and led great men.

Posted by A Student for Equality at 4:30 PM on Feb 18, 2009 | Report this comment

After reading this story, I am very disappointed that the Kelley School gave General Pace this honor. Indiana University should not be honoring people who are bigots. I have to ask -- Will IU start honoring outspoken racists next? As a state school, IU should be working to establish a welcoming and inclusive community for all people. I imagine that IU's gay and lesbian students don't find Pace to be a very welcoming, nor inclusive person. By honoring Pace, IU is saying that homophobia is acceptable. But you know, homophobia, or any kind of hatred based on one's identity - is never, ever acceptable. Homophobia is a hateful form of bigotry and I am disgusted that IU would allow this man to be here. Frankly, my friends and I are shocked and angered that IU would allow this bigoted man on the campus.

Posted by who's ear at 10:17 AM on Feb 18, 2009 | Report this comment

Passing a resolution like this seems rather childish. Pace wasn't brought to IU to talk about his views on homosexuality -- rather, they're reaching back to views he expressed in a completely separate interview years ago. So does this now mean we can't bring any speakers to IU who think homosexuality is wrong? What about speakers with any controversial viewpoint -- especially one that doesn't necessarily affect what they're speaking about. This, again, sets the wrong precedent of one-way tolerance.


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Faculty council regrets Pace honor
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*