The case for political correctness
By
Indira Dammu |
IDS
POSTED AT
10:40 PM ON Nov. 5, 2008
| PRINT |
Email
| SHARE
| COMMENTS (5)
On college campuses, including ours, few words receive the condemnation and vitriol reserved for that dreaded phrase “political correctness.”
The supposed evils of the P.C. movement are well- documented. We’re now subjected to classes about “multicultural studies” or “white privilege.” Students are generally not permitted to use stereotypical terms. Such accommodations are often seen as evidence of the radical left agenda, one that purports to squelching free speech on campus. After all, if I want to call someone a name, I should have every right to do so.
Unfortunately for such free-thinkers, there is a perceptible difference between having the right to do something and actually exercising that right. Sure, we could all say generally offensive things about various groups, but whatever happened to promoting respect and tolerance for others?
Political correctness happens to be an often misunderstood word. The P.C. movement isn’t about denying free speech rights or imposing a uniform mode of thinking. In reality, the movement forces individuals to think about what they’re saying and its consequences, especially for others. Essentially, political correctness promotes civility and emphasizes the consideration of others’ feelings.
This might lead some to wonder: What’s in a phrase, exactly? Calling someone a name couldn’t possibly be hurtful because it’s just a word that possesses no inherent value. The problem with this line of reasoning is that language often forms the basis for a group’s identity. Consequently, members of marginalized groups should have the ability to control the language and words that define them. Politically correct speech is one way to promulgate such a defined identity.
All too often, however, college campuses, including student newspapers, publicize repugnant and politically incorrect views under the guise of the First Amendment. The implication here is that the free exchange of ideas creates a more vibrant learning environment. Moreover, it is often considered cavalier, particularly for Republicans, to express politically incorrect views.
I would argue, however, that not all opinions are equal. When a campus newspaper publishes a racist column, the editors are legitimizing racist views.
While the newspaper staff might not necessarily agree with the views expressed, they are tacitly acknowledging that the column and the views contained therein possess some inherent value.
To be sure, attempts by white liberals to practice political correctness can often seem insincere. Many of these liberals expect a gold star or a pat on the back for not causing offense to anyone. Additionally, there are limits to political correctness. For instance, did you know that the politically correct word for slum now is “economically depressed zone”?
Nevertheless, the intent of political correctness cannot be disputed. Civility and tolerance of others, no matter their ethnic, religious or sexual background, are important tenets of IU’s values. P.C. speech is one way to promote that.
So, don’t be fooled by the current campaign against political correctness on campus.
The truth is everyone deserves the right to be treated with civility and respect. And contrary to what some might say, that’s really what the movement is about.