Activists Attempting to Raise Our Tuition for Corporate Gains

November 11th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

The cost of college is out of control, rising three times faster than inflation, even during a recession, and yet despite the recession activist groups on campus are pushing for policies that are leading to huge profits for architects of the financial collapse like Morgan Stanley and Citigroup.

The Sierra Club, a recipient of wind-energy giant General Electric’s corporate donations, is pushing for universities to switch off coal, and they have a lot of backing on campus. INPIRG has also been involved in the anti-coal push.

Tuition is high enough as it is without expensive, inefficient energy production, and this is a bad time to try to raise tuition further.

Obama Energy Secretary and 1997 Nobel Prize winner Steven Chu says that solar power is far too expensive to compete. Coal is the most cost-effective energy source. America is falling behind though, in effective cleaner sources. China is taking the lead in clean energy, building one clean energy plant a month. Clean coal, including technologies like carbon sequestration, could help the economy rebound while decreasing our reliance on foreign energy, as the United States has the world’s most coal reserves. Now, however, China will surpass us in an area with which we have natural advantages.

Oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens has been pushing wind power, but he canceld his plans for a wind farm in Texas after the state didn’t give build power transmission lines for him. Government subsidies are the only thing supporting wind power. Subsidies and tax breaks are given to corporations that profit from wind power, including Morgan Stanley and Citigroup, both with $100 million riding on wind power.

Other alternative sources like nuclear power face similar problems. Nuclear power is actually the cheapest energy source to operate once it is operating, but the cost to build a plant can be up to $12 billion. Of course, it also is the cleanest energy source emission-wise, but there are still unsolved problems about depositing used fuel.

Mitchell Blatt | 1 Comment »

More Artificially Inflated Home Values, More Record Extentions of Entitlements

November 6th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

If we’re in the midst of an economic crisis caused largely by artificially inflated home values, our Congress thinks the solution is to continue artificially inflating home values.

They just extended (again) a tax credit that pays people $8,000 to buy a house. You even get $6,500 if you already own a house and want to buy a new one.

Don’t think you qualify? If you earn up to $125,000 as an individual or $225,000 as a couple, you can take advantage of this giveaway. Sorry, millionaires, this is only for poor people.

Economists say that most people who are taking the government’s money for their home purchases would have purchased anyway, so at least it’s increasing sales.

But since we are in the midst of an economic recovery, we won’t need to keep helping people with entitlements much longer, will we? Well, no, it’s a jobless recovery, so Congress also extended unemployment (again) for the longest time evah.

I guess the recovery ends when the government stops spending money.

Back to Houses:
The government is also making sure people can afford their houses. Or, rather, making sure the government can afford their houses.

From our friends at Fannie Mae, who also helped people afford houses previously, by artificially increasing demand and thus increasing prices:

Fannie Mae, the federally controlled mortgage company, announced a Deed for Lease program in which those in danger of eviction may be able to stay as tenants in their houses for at least a year.

Like I said, the recovery ends when the government stops spending money.

Mitchell Blatt | No Comments »

What’s the Point of Pegging Entitlements to Inflation?

October 15th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

Federal minimum wage laws have sometimes been criticized because it hasn’t been tied to inflation, thus not forcing companies to increase their minimum wages at the rate of prices.

Tying it to inflation would give minimum-wage workers higher pay generally, as prices typically rise more quickly than Congress has increased the minimum wage, thus it might make it easier for minimum wage workers to purchase products.

So if prices rise a lot, low-paid workers see the same relative increase in buying power.

If prices don’t rise much, you don’t need as much of an increase in salary, because you don’t have to purchase any more than you did.

That’s what’s happening now in some states like Colorado and Oregon. Even with their wages being increased with inflation, there are still people complaining.
Read the rest of this entry »

Mitchell Blatt | No Comments »

Richard Dawkins Giving a Speech on Evolution is a Non-Controversial Event That Doesn’t Question God

October 12th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

Richard Dawkins coming to campus is pretty interesting considering he’s a controversial celebrity atheist–otherwise known as a “fascist” to Bill O’Reilly–but the topic he’s going to be speaking on doesn’t appear to bring with it much controversy.

His speech is billed by the Secular Alliance at IU as a speech on the evidence of evolution. If he speaks on evolution, he will just be confirming what is already strongly accepted as fact in science and academia. The actual process of evolution can be seen as fact, but it’s not clear how the creation of life occurred, so I guess religious people can keep arguing about that.

But regardless of how life began, any explanation wouldn’t cast much additional doubt upon God’s existence. Read the rest of this entry »

Mitchell Blatt | 1 Comment »

Terrorism Alert: Republicans Planning Terrorist Attacks Over the Nobel Peace Price

October 10th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

DNC communications director Brad Woodhouse issued this urgent statement yesterday:

“The Republican Party has thrown in its lot with the terrorists – the Taliban and Hamas this morning – in criticizing the President for receiving the Nobel Peace prize.”

Politico

This follows Barbara Boxer’s warning that, “The head of the Republican National Committee was very, very harsh … and so the Taliban were very, very harsh, too.”

(Just for the record, Michael Steele asked, “What has Obama accomplished?” and Obama said in his speech, “To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformational figures who have been honored by this prize,” so we should keep an eyeout for Osama Obama engaging in terrorism, too.)

Earlier this summer, Baron Hill warned that Republicans might commit Jihad at a townhall meeting:

“There are some people acting like political terrorists by disrupting these town hall meetings going on around the country and it’s not meaningful dialogue.”

Watch out for those Republicans.
Read the rest of this entry »

Mitchell Blatt | 2 Comments »

With the First Stimulus Not Having Worked, the Democrats Are Planning Another One

October 8th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

We just spent $787 billion to “stimulate” the economy earlier this year, and that $787 billion has worked out so poorly that the Democrats are planning to spend billions more on a second stimulus.

After the success of the first stimulus, we should definitely trust them to spend billions more on anything they want.

Just to put into perspective how well the stimulus package worked, the Obama administration projected that the unemployment rate would skyrocket to 9% if the stimulus plan didn’t pass. Now it’s 9.8%.

Still, the stimulus package was supposed to be long-term help. Spending continued for three years, and in August, just 12% of the money was spent.

There’s two conclusions: Either the stimulus is long-term, so we should let it work itself out before we embark on another massive spending quest, or the stimulus hasn’t worked, so why should we trust another stimulus?

Considering the state of the economy, I’d say it hasn’t worked, and considering the state of the $1,800 billion deficit, I’d say we shouldn’t spend billions more on something else that won’t work.

Mitchell Blatt | No Comments »

Stop Greedy Insurance Execs From Denying Claims! Support Big Government Denying Claims!

October 6th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

Tired of big insurance denying medical claims?

Obama has got the perfect solution for you: big government denying your claims!

According to the American Medical Association, Medicare was the resounding leader in claims denied, beating Aetna by a score of 6.85% to 6.80%. Most of the insurers fells between 2 percent and 4 percent.

In Massachusetts Read the rest of this entry »

Mitchell Blatt | 1 Comment »

Millionaire Capitalistic Filmmaker Calls His Profession “Evil”

October 1st, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

After Creating Films That Grossed Over $300 Million, Michael Moore Says “Capitalism Did Nothing For Me.”

UPDATE

Michael Moore’s recent interviews show he has some fundamental misunderstandings about what is capitalism, as his sixth documentary, Capitalism: A Love Story hits theatres.

Most importantly, he denies the fact that people engaging in the voluntary exchange of money for movie tickets and DVDs is capitalism.

Moore said to CNS News reporters that, “Capitalism has done nothing for me.”

“In fact, in Fahrenheit 9/11 if you remember, capitalism, the Disney Corporation, tried to kill that film–tried to make it so that people couldn’t see it. My book Stupid White Men–Harper Collins tried to kill that book so that people couldn’t see it. It’s only because I put the light of day on it and told people what was going on did people get the chance to see these things.”

Neither of those scenarios reflects on capitalism harming Moore. Disney may have “tried to kill Fahrenheit 9/11″ (which would be very counterproductive of them, considering they paid him $21 million to produce it), but it ended up grossing over $200 million worldwide and earning Disney a $46 million profit, so I’d say that Disney did a bad job of denying themselves profit by killing the movie.

The fact is that Moore made an entertaining movie that people wanted to see, and because of that, he made millions through the capitalist system. Disney had good motivation to put the movie out in front of people, because they profited from having people watch it.

If, however, Disney didn’t want to show it, because, say, they didn’t like the politics, as Moore seems to suggest, they would have their right not to show it, but other companies would scramble to finance Moore in hopes of turning a profit.
Read the rest of this entry »

Mitchell Blatt | No Comments »

The Best Healthcare System?

September 18th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

Ashley Ames notes in her latest post, that

There are a lot of things that can be argued about health care. That America has the best system is not one of them.

A lot of people from Canada who leave their country for American healthcare when they get a tumor might try to argue that.

America has the highest survival rate in the world for most types of cancer.


- Telegraph

According to the first study of survival rates by country, Read the rest of this entry »

Mitchell Blatt | 3 Comments »

Religious Fanatics Angry Over Obama’s Mention of Religious Freedom

January 24th, 2009 by Mitchell Blatt

During Obama’s inaugural speech, he had the audacity to mention America’s religious freedom, and for that he is being begrudged by some religious people.

Obama described America as a “nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and nonbelievers.”

Considering the fact that Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and athiests–and satanists and wiccans and buddhists and scientologists–all live in America and comprise our nation and have their rights protected in the First Amendment, I don’t see where he’s wrong.

However, he is wrong, because he is “trying to redefine American culture, which is distinctively Christian,” says Bishop E.W. Jackson of the Exodus Faith Ministries in Chesapeake, Va.

Funny, because I thought America’s culture was distinctively one of liberty and freedom, and I thought some of the first Americans came here to escape religious persecution.

Jackson appeared on a radio show and took calls from many who were offended by atheists for not believing in a God. Jackson elaborated, “Obviously, Jewish heritage is very much a part of Christianity; the Jewish Bible is part of our Bible. But Hindu, Muslim, and nonbelievers? I don’t think so. We are not a Muslim nation or a nonbelieving nation.”

Right, we aren’t a Muslim nation or a nonbelieving nation or a Christian nation. We shouldn’t let religion get involved in politics and define our nation.

On the other side, there are many gay rights fanatics mad that Obama had the Rev. Rick Warren give prayers simply because they disagree with Mr. Warren about whether gay people should have “marriages” or “civil unions” regardless of the fact that they already have the same legal rights.

Mitchell Blatt, Politics | 6 Comments »

« Previous Entries